TY - JOUR
T1 - Ability to identify patient-ventilator asynchronies in intensive care unit professionals
T2 - A multicenter cross-sectional analytical study
AU - Enríquez Popayán, Andrés Mauricio
AU - Ramírez, Iván Ignacio
AU - Zúñiga, Juan Felipe
AU - Gutierrez-Arias, Ruvistay
AU - Jiménez Pérez, Mayda Alejandra
AU - Parada-Gereda, Henry Mauricio
AU - Pardo Cocuy, Luis Fernando
AU - Colmenares, Ana Lucia Rangel
AU - Castro Chaparro, Nubia
AU - Pinza Ortega, Ana
AU - Martínez Díaz, Jorge
AU - Hurtado Laverde, Johanna
AU - Henao Cruz, Joismer Alejandro
N1 - © 2025 Andrés Mauricio Enríquez Popayán et al., published by Sciendo.
PY - 2025/4
Y1 - 2025/4
N2 - INTRODUCTION: Patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) is frequent in intensive care. Its presence is associated with prolonged days of mechanical ventilation and may lead to increased mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital. Little is known about the ability of Colombian intensive care professionals to identify asynchronies, and the factors associated with their correct identification are not apparent.AIM OF THE STUDY: To describe the ability of Colombian intensive care professionals to identify patient-ventilator asynchronies (PVA) using waveform analysis. In addition, to define the characteristics associated with correctly detecting PVA.MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, cross-sectional, national survey-based study between January and August 2024. Colombian physiotherapists, respiratory therapists, nurses and intensive care physicians from 24 departments participated in the study. An online survey was used. They were asked to identify six different PVAs presented as videos. The videos were displayed using pressure/time and flow/time waveform of a Puritan Bennett 840 ventilator.RESULTS: We recruited 900 participants, 60% female, most of whom were physiotherapists (53%). Most professionals had specialty training in critical care (42%), and 32% reported having specific PVA training. Double triggering was the most frequently identified PVA (75%). However, only 3.67% of participants recognized all six PVAs. According to multiple logistic regression analysis, working in a mixed unit (OR 2.59; 95% CI 1.19 - 5.54), caring for neonates (OR 5.19; 95% CI 1.77 - 15.20), and having specific training (OR 2.38; 95% CI 1.16 - 4.76) increases the chance of correctly recognizing all PVAs.CONCLUSION: In Colombia, a low percentage of professionals recognize all PVAs. Having specific training in this topic, working in mixed ICUs and neonatal intensive care was significantly associated with identifying all PVAs.
AB - INTRODUCTION: Patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) is frequent in intensive care. Its presence is associated with prolonged days of mechanical ventilation and may lead to increased mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital. Little is known about the ability of Colombian intensive care professionals to identify asynchronies, and the factors associated with their correct identification are not apparent.AIM OF THE STUDY: To describe the ability of Colombian intensive care professionals to identify patient-ventilator asynchronies (PVA) using waveform analysis. In addition, to define the characteristics associated with correctly detecting PVA.MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, cross-sectional, national survey-based study between January and August 2024. Colombian physiotherapists, respiratory therapists, nurses and intensive care physicians from 24 departments participated in the study. An online survey was used. They were asked to identify six different PVAs presented as videos. The videos were displayed using pressure/time and flow/time waveform of a Puritan Bennett 840 ventilator.RESULTS: We recruited 900 participants, 60% female, most of whom were physiotherapists (53%). Most professionals had specialty training in critical care (42%), and 32% reported having specific PVA training. Double triggering was the most frequently identified PVA (75%). However, only 3.67% of participants recognized all six PVAs. According to multiple logistic regression analysis, working in a mixed unit (OR 2.59; 95% CI 1.19 - 5.54), caring for neonates (OR 5.19; 95% CI 1.77 - 15.20), and having specific training (OR 2.38; 95% CI 1.16 - 4.76) increases the chance of correctly recognizing all PVAs.CONCLUSION: In Colombia, a low percentage of professionals recognize all PVAs. Having specific training in this topic, working in mixed ICUs and neonatal intensive care was significantly associated with identifying all PVAs.
U2 - 10.2478/jccm-2025-0017
DO - 10.2478/jccm-2025-0017
M3 - Artículo
C2 - 40386701
SN - 2393-1809
VL - 11
SP - 157
EP - 163
JO - Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures)
JF - Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures)
IS - 2
ER -