TY - JOUR
T1 - Which is the best timing for performing a cholecystectomy after percutaneous cholecystostomy?
AU - Pesce, Antonio
AU - Ramírez-Giraldo, Camilo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2024.
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard for managing acute cholecystitis. However, in high-risk surgical patients, percutaneous cholecystostomy is frequently used either as a bridge to surgery or as definitive treatment. When employed as a bridge to surgery, the optimal timing for laparoscopic cholecystectomy after cholecystostomy remains unclear. Methods: A critical review of the literature was conducted, focusing particularly on the article published by Spaniolas, et al., presented at SAGES 2024, to evaluate the optimal timing for performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy after a cholecystostomy, according to the available evidence. Results: The available literature was found to be limited. The timing thresholds vary across studies, preventing a pooled evaluation of the effect size. The study by Spaniolas, et al. has several limitations, including the exclusion of subtotal cholecystectomies from the composite endpoint and the introduction of implausible variables in the logistic regression model. Conclusion: Ideally, the procedure should be performed when it is least technically demanding, minimizing the need for rescue procedures (such as subtotal cholecystectomy, antegrade cholecystectomy, or conversion to open surgery) and reducing complications. This topic is increasingly relevant in clinical practice. However, the current scientific evidence remains limited.
AB - Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard for managing acute cholecystitis. However, in high-risk surgical patients, percutaneous cholecystostomy is frequently used either as a bridge to surgery or as definitive treatment. When employed as a bridge to surgery, the optimal timing for laparoscopic cholecystectomy after cholecystostomy remains unclear. Methods: A critical review of the literature was conducted, focusing particularly on the article published by Spaniolas, et al., presented at SAGES 2024, to evaluate the optimal timing for performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy after a cholecystostomy, according to the available evidence. Results: The available literature was found to be limited. The timing thresholds vary across studies, preventing a pooled evaluation of the effect size. The study by Spaniolas, et al. has several limitations, including the exclusion of subtotal cholecystectomies from the composite endpoint and the introduction of implausible variables in the logistic regression model. Conclusion: Ideally, the procedure should be performed when it is least technically demanding, minimizing the need for rescue procedures (such as subtotal cholecystectomy, antegrade cholecystectomy, or conversion to open surgery) and reducing complications. This topic is increasingly relevant in clinical practice. However, the current scientific evidence remains limited.
KW - Acute cholecystitis
KW - Cholecystectomy
KW - Cholecystostomy
KW - Interval cholecystectomy
KW - Percutaneous gallbladder drainage
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85212038385&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00464-024-11432-3
DO - 10.1007/s00464-024-11432-3
M3 - Comentario/Debate
AN - SCOPUS:85212038385
SN - 0930-2794
VL - 39
SP - 14
EP - 15
JO - Surgical Endoscopy
JF - Surgical Endoscopy
IS - 1
ER -