TY - JOUR
T1 - Intermediate risk of choledocholithiasis
T2 - are we on the right path?
AU - Girón, Felipe
AU - Rodríguez, Lina M.
AU - Conde, Danny
AU - Rey Chaves, Carlos E.
AU - Vanegas, Marco
AU - Venegas, David
AU - Gutiérrez, Fernando
AU - Nassar, Ricardo
AU - Hernández, Juan D.
AU - Jiménez, Daniel
AU - Núñez-Rocha, Ricardo E.
AU - Niño, Laura
AU - Rojas, Susana
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
PY - 2023/1
Y1 - 2023/1
N2 - UNLABELLED: The risk of choledocholithiasis should be assessed in every patient undergoing cholecystectomy to define the next step. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy proposed a stratified predictor scale of choledocholithiasis. Therefore, we aimed to describe our experience managing patients with an intermediate risk of choledocholithiasis according to the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines and the actual presence of bile duct stones in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.METHODS: A retrospective observational study with a prospective database was conducted. The analysis included sociodemographic data, laboratory values, and imaging. Bivariate, multivariate, and receiver operating characteristic analysis were performed.RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-seven patients had an intermediate risk for choledocholithiasis. Half the patients were at least 65 years old. 24.77% were diagnosed with choledocholithiasis. Bile duct dilation was documented in only 3.06% of cases. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis is associated with an age odds ratio (OR): 1.87 (
P 0.02), alkaline phosphatase OR: 2.44 (
P 0.02), and bile duct dilation greater than 6 mm OR: 14.65 (
P 0.00).
CONCLUSIONS: High variability in the accuracy of imaging techniques results in a large number of patients classified as intermediate risk without choledocholithiasis in cholangioresonance. Therefore, enhancing the criteria to define intermediate risk for patients in order to optimize resources is of paramount importance.
AB - UNLABELLED: The risk of choledocholithiasis should be assessed in every patient undergoing cholecystectomy to define the next step. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy proposed a stratified predictor scale of choledocholithiasis. Therefore, we aimed to describe our experience managing patients with an intermediate risk of choledocholithiasis according to the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines and the actual presence of bile duct stones in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.METHODS: A retrospective observational study with a prospective database was conducted. The analysis included sociodemographic data, laboratory values, and imaging. Bivariate, multivariate, and receiver operating characteristic analysis were performed.RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-seven patients had an intermediate risk for choledocholithiasis. Half the patients were at least 65 years old. 24.77% were diagnosed with choledocholithiasis. Bile duct dilation was documented in only 3.06% of cases. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis is associated with an age odds ratio (OR): 1.87 (
P 0.02), alkaline phosphatase OR: 2.44 (
P 0.02), and bile duct dilation greater than 6 mm OR: 14.65 (
P 0.00).
CONCLUSIONS: High variability in the accuracy of imaging techniques results in a large number of patients classified as intermediate risk without choledocholithiasis in cholangioresonance. Therefore, enhancing the criteria to define intermediate risk for patients in order to optimize resources is of paramount importance.
KW - ASGE guidelines
KW - MRCP
KW - choledocholithiasis risk
KW - cholelithiasis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85161524716&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/f3c27306-26fa-347d-8a16-baedaa7d9053/
U2 - 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000124
DO - 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000124
M3 - Artículo
C2 - 37113967
AN - SCOPUS:85161524716
SN - 2049-0801
VL - 85
SP - 659
EP - 664
JO - Annals of Medicine and Surgery
JF - Annals of Medicine and Surgery
IS - 4
ER -